That's the only solid way of ensuring that changes WILL have to be committed no-brainer I know, but seems to be uncertain in your scenario or otherwise they simply will not end up in the deployment. It enforces the process of good release management, not to forget you can add all sorts of other wonderful automation things to your build server like unit testing and functional testing. So instead of using ftp to push things to the server, I just log on to it and run an svn up.
By doing this manually this way you gain several benefits, including the ability to roll back in the event of buggy code. I'd also recommend using a db migration system assuming you're using a database. That'll allow you to easily roll back db schema changes to make sure that your code will continue to work in the event of a rollback.
Combining these with a tool similar to Fabric or Capistrano , would give you a very robust and powerful deployment system. Some people here have mentioned using a distributed vcs. Some of the most popular examples of these are git and mercurial there are several others.
Both of these have a different usage pattern than svn, but that doesn't really apply to this question directly. The biggest gain you could have there is that if you do tags for each push to the live server the cost of doing so is miniscule compared to the traditional tagging pattern for svn. If you wished to expirement with either of those GitHub and BitBucket both offer free repository hosting for git and mercurial respectively.
That being said I am I huge proponent of using a dvcs and my personal preference is mercurial. Springloops does exactly what you require. Give it a go. You work on you local working copy, then commit changes to repository, then via Springloops deploy them selected revision to any server Staging or Production via FTP. I would suggest that before implementing below that you utilize a test environment where you can FTP directly, then to push live, commit that version of files and allow this task to run.
This is done all the time, and is easily accomplished by adding a post-commit hook script to your repository. Read about hook scripts in Chapter 5 of the book. The basic idea is to make the "live site" just an ordinary working copy, and then have your post-commit hook script run 'svn update' on it. In practice, there are a couple of things to watch out for. The server program performing the commit svnserve or apache is the same program that will be running the post-commit hook script. That means that this program must have proper permissions to update the working copy.
In other words, the working copy must be owned by the same user that svnserve or apache runs as -- or at least the working copy must have appropriate permissions set.
Compile a tiny C program:. Then in the post-commit hook, add a line to run the binary. Also, you'll probably want to prevent apache from exporting the. Add this to your httpd. This way when changes are committed, your web server will be updated. The best way I found to do this is to ensure that nothing uncommitted can escape to the server - this is a loophole you have to fix first.
Then, set up a local checkout of the parts of your repository that you want to sync and use rsync to push the data to the server FTP really isn't that useful in this context. The older still supported release of Apache Subversion is: 1. Use the links below to download Apache Subversion from one of our mirrors. You must verify the integrity of the downloaded files using signatures downloaded from our main directory.
The following are the currently supported versions of Subversion. Older releases are available from the archive download site.
The Apache Subversion project only distributes source code, but a number of third parties provide binary packages for a number of platforms. If a file is added or modified in the unencrypted folder, it gets encrypted. If a file is added or modified in the encrypted folder, it get decrypted to the other folder. More information here about CryptSync. TortoiseSVN and the recycle bin Posted on September 22, Subversion's design is made up so that you will never ever lose any data. But there's one command that will do exactly that: Revert.
Reverting means discarding all modifications you've made to one or more files which you haven't committed yet. But what if you selected the wrong file s to revert? Sure, TortoiseSVN always asks you first before it reverts the files.
But as we all know, such "Are you sure? So what if you reverted files and you then discover that you shouldn't have done that? Table of Contents. Share On:. View More Posts Michael Morgan. Eldernode Writer.
We Are Waiting for your valuable comments and you can be sure that it will be answered in the shortest possible time. Post A Comment. Leave Your Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Choose Your Level Advance Beginner
0コメント